Alvenaria Não Reforçada: O Tipo de Edifício Mais Perigoso

The Nature of Unreinforced Masonry

Unreinforced Masonry (URM)Brick or block construction without steel reinforcement, which is extremely vulnerable to earthquake shaking. URM buildings account for the majority of earthquake fatalities worldwide. describes construction using brick, stone, concrete block, or adobe held together with mortar but containing no steel reinforcement. For millennia, masonry was the dominant construction material for permanent structures worldwide. Its strengths — compressive durability, fire resistance, and thermal mass — are genuine and valuable. Its fatal weakness in earthquakes, however, has been recognized since at least the 18th century: masonry is brittle, weak in tension, and lacks the ductility needed to absorb seismic energy without catastrophic fracture.

The problem is fundamental to masonry's material properties. Brick and mortar resist compression well but have almost no tensile strength. Earthquake ground shaking subjects walls to forces that flex, rock, and tension the masonry in ways that the material simply cannot resist. When the tensile stress at any section exceeds the bond strength between brick and mortar, cracking begins. With no steel reinforcement to bridge cracks and maintain integrity, the wall fails rapidly once cracking starts, with little warning and no ductile reserve capacity.

Failure Mechanisms

Unreinforced Masonry (URM)Brick or block construction without steel reinforcement, which is extremely vulnerable to earthquake shaking. URM buildings account for the majority of earthquake fatalities worldwide. walls fail in characteristic patterns during earthquakes. Out-of-plane failure — where walls perpendicular to ground motion overturn or collapse outward — is the most deadly. These walls, loaded laterally by earthquake inertia, act as vertical cantilevers or simply-supported plates. Without steel reinforcement or adequate connections to floors and diaphragms, they have very limited capacity to resist these forces. The wall cracks at its weakest cross-section, typically at a mortar joint, and falls — often outward onto the street or neighboring properties.

In-plane failure of walls parallel to ground motion is characterized by diagonal shear cracking in an X pattern that reflects the tension and compression fields within the rocking, shearing masonry. Spandrel beams between windows crack diagonally. Piers between openings rock and slide. The overall building racking displaces the roof or floor above, potentially losing vertical support. Corner failures are common, as the intersection of two walls creates stress concentrations that propagate cracks.

Floor-to-wall connections in older Unreinforced Masonry (URM)Brick or block construction without steel reinforcement, which is extremely vulnerable to earthquake shaking. URM buildings account for the majority of earthquake fatalities worldwide. buildings are frequently inadequate. Floor joists may simply rest in pockets cut into the masonry wall, relying on gravity and friction for horizontal connection. When the wall moves laterally, the floor joists pull out of their pockets, and the floors collapse independently of the walls. This "falling floors" mechanism has caused a disproportionate share of masonry-building fatalities because it occurs rapidly and offers no warning.

The Global Scale of the Problem

Unreinforced Masonry (URM)Brick or block construction without steel reinforcement, which is extremely vulnerable to earthquake shaking. URM buildings account for the majority of earthquake fatalities worldwide. remains the most common construction type worldwide and is responsible for the majority of earthquake fatalities globally. The 2010 Haiti earthquake killed approximately 160,000 people, largely through the collapse of unreinforced concrete and masonry construction in Port-au-Prince — a city where more than half the structures used this construction type. The 2005 Kashmir earthquake killed over 80,000 people through masonry collapses in mountainous terrain. The 2008 Sichuan earthquake killed nearly 70,000, with masonry school buildings accounting for a disproportionate share of fatalities among children.

In the United States and other developed countries, the Unreinforced Masonry (URM)Brick or block construction without steel reinforcement, which is extremely vulnerable to earthquake shaking. URM buildings account for the majority of earthquake fatalities worldwide. stock is primarily pre-World War II commercial and residential buildings in older downtowns and urban neighborhoods. These buildings often have significant historic, cultural, and economic value, complicating retrofit decisions. California's unreinforced masonry hazard reduction program, begun in the 1980s following the 1971 San Fernando earthquake, has resulted in the retrofit or demolition of thousands of buildings but substantial vulnerable stock remains.

Building Code Evolution

The inadequacy of Unreinforced Masonry (URM)Brick or block construction without steel reinforcement, which is extremely vulnerable to earthquake shaking. URM buildings account for the majority of earthquake fatalities worldwide. in seismic regions has been recognized in Building Code (Seismic)A set of legal requirements governing the design and construction of buildings to ensure minimum levels of earthquake safety. Updated after major earthquakes reveal new vulnerabilities. development for decades. Most modern building codes in high-seismic areas prohibit new unreinforced masonry construction entirely or require reinforcement that fundamentally changes the material's behavior. Reinforced masonry — with vertical and horizontal steel reinforcement grouted into the masonry cells — behaves in a controlled, ductile manner that can match reinforced concrete in seismic performance.

California banned new unreinforced masonry construction in high-seismic zones in 1967, following the 1933 Long Beach earthquake that destroyed 230 school buildings. Most other western U.S. states followed in subsequent decades. However, the enormous existing stock of pre-ban buildings in older cities and towns means that Unreinforced Masonry (URM)Brick or block construction without steel reinforcement, which is extremely vulnerable to earthquake shaking. URM buildings account for the majority of earthquake fatalities worldwide. risk will persist for generations unless addressed through systematic retrofit programs.

Seismic Retrofit Approaches

Seismic RetrofitStrengthening an existing building to improve its earthquake resistance. Common methods include adding steel bracing, reinforcing foundations, and bolting structures to foundations. of Unreinforced Masonry (URM)Brick or block construction without steel reinforcement, which is extremely vulnerable to earthquake shaking. URM buildings account for the majority of earthquake fatalities worldwide. buildings aims to address the three primary failure mechanisms: out-of-plane wall collapse, inadequate floor-to-wall connections, and in-plane wall weakness. The retrofit strategy must address all three to be effective.

Wall anchors are typically the first priority. Through-bolts or chemical anchors connect floor and roof diaphragms to masonry walls, preventing the walls from overturning out-of-plane. These anchors must be spaced closely enough and designed strongly enough to distribute the seismic inertia of the wall into the floor system. Adding blocking, ledger boards, or steel angle connections at the floor perimeter ensures that the floor diaphragm can receive and distribute these forces.

Diaphragm stiffening addresses a complementary problem. Many older Unreinforced Masonry (URM)Brick or block construction without steel reinforcement, which is extremely vulnerable to earthquake shaking. URM buildings account for the majority of earthquake fatalities worldwide. buildings have flexible wood floor and roof diaphragms that cannot effectively transfer lateral forces between walls. Adding plywood sheathing to existing board sheathing dramatically increases diaphragm stiffness, reducing differential movement between walls and improving overall building response. A stiffened diaphragm acts as a rigid collector, evenly distributing seismic forces among all walls in proportion to their stiffness and strength.

Parapet removal or bracing addresses a particularly acute life-safety hazard. Masonry parapets — the sections of wall projecting above the roof line — are highly vulnerable to out-of-plane failure and have caused fatalities in numerous earthquakes when they collapse onto streets, sidewalks, and occupants attempting to exit buildings. Many retrofit ordinances specifically require parapet mitigation as a minimum baseline intervention.

The Building Safety Checker tool evaluates buildings based on construction type, era, and configuration to assess unreinforced masonry risk and suggest appropriate next steps, from professional engineering evaluation to specific retrofit strategies.

Economics and Policy

The cost-benefit calculus for Unreinforced Masonry (URM)Brick or block construction without steel reinforcement, which is extremely vulnerable to earthquake shaking. URM buildings account for the majority of earthquake fatalities worldwide. retrofit is generally favorable in high-seismic regions, but the upfront cost burden on property owners — particularly small landlords — creates implementation barriers. A typical three-story commercial building retrofit might cost $150,000-$400,000. The FEMA P-154 rapid visual screening methodology allows trained screeners to quickly assess hundreds of buildings and prioritize those requiring detailed engineering evaluation.

Several California jurisdictions have demonstrated that mandatory retrofit programs can dramatically reduce risk. Los Angeles's pre-Northridge unreinforced masonry program resulted in most affected buildings being retrofitted or demolished before the earthquake, likely preventing hundreds of additional deaths. The experience demonstrates that systematic, time-limited mandatory programs with financing assistance and clear enforcement can achieve community-wide risk reduction that voluntary programs cannot.

The decision to retrofit rather than demolish involves historic preservation considerations, economic feasibility, and the needs of existing tenants and communities. For historic structures, specialized preservation techniques allow retrofit without destroying architectural character. The Seismic RetrofitStrengthening an existing building to improve its earthquake resistance. Common methods include adding steel bracing, reinforcing foundations, and bolting structures to foundations. of historic masonry buildings is a specialized discipline requiring engineers with expertise in both seismic engineering and historic preservation methods.