有感半径计算器

Calculate how far an earthquake can be felt and what intensity you would experience.

Calculation

地震有感半径如何确定

地震的有感半径是人能感知震动的距震中最大距离。它主要取决于震级和深度，但也受到当地地质条件、时间（静坐时更容易注意到震动）和建筑类型的影响。地震学模型使用烈度衰减关系来估算有感半径，描述修正麦加利烈度（MMI）如何随距离递减。人类感知的阈值约为MMI II级——建筑物高层的人可能注意到的轻微振动。

深度在确定有感半径方面起着至关重要的作用。深度5公里的浅层地震将能量集中在地表附近，产生强烈但局部的震动。同样震级但深度100公里的地震将能量分散到更大的体积中，产生更广泛的有感区域但峰值强度较低。这就是为什么深层地震往往在极大距离上被感知——2013年深度609公里的M8.3鄂霍次克海地震在整个俄罗斯都有震感，但由于长传播路径上的能量衰减，几乎没有造成损害。

修正麦加利烈度等级

MMI I-II级：无感或几乎无感。仅被地震仪检测到或被高楼上层静止的少数人感知。
MMI III-IV级：室内许多人有感。悬挂物摆动；感觉像卡车经过。无损害。
MMI V-VI级：几乎所有人都有感。碗碟破碎，书架上的书掉落，墙壁出现细微裂缝。可能出现轻微结构损伤。
MMI VII级以上：抗震性差的结构受损。人难以站立。设计良好的结构在MMI VIII级及以上可能遭受中等损害。

常见用途

为应急规划和公共通讯估算地震可感知范围。
了解地震深度与可感知震动区域之间的关系。
为风险评估比较不同地震场景的潜在影响区域。

How to Use

1
Enter Magnitude and Depth
Input the earthquake's moment magnitude (Mw) and focal depth in kilometers. Depth is the most important modifier of felt radius after magnitude—shallow events (< 15 km) are felt over smaller but more intensely shaken areas.
2
Select Regional Attenuation
Choose your tectonic region. Eastern continental regions (eastern US, stable cratonic areas) have lower attenuation and transmit seismic waves farther than western active tectonic regions (western US, Japan) where the crust attenuates energy more rapidly.
3
Read the Intensity Map
View the estimated MMI contours at distances ranging from the epicenter to several hundred kilometers. Each contour corresponds to a descriptor from 'not felt' to 'violent shaking,' based on USGS ShakeMap attenuation relations.

About

The geographical extent of earthquake felt shaking depends on a cascade of physical processes that attenuate seismic energy from the source to distant sites. Ground Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs) are the mathematical backbone of felt-radius estimation, empirically derived from hundreds of thousands of ground motion recordings worldwide. Modern GMPEs are region-specific: the eastern US crustal model (Atkinson and Boore 2006) predicts felt radii roughly twice those of equivalent-magnitude western US events because the cold, rigid eastern craton transmits seismic waves with lower attenuation (higher Q values) than the warm, fractured western crust.

The USGS 'Did You Feel It?' citizen science platform has transformed intensity estimation. Since its launch in 1997, it has collected over 100 million intensity reports from millions of contributors worldwide, providing dense spatial coverage of felt shaking that instrumental networks alone cannot match. Statistical algorithms convert individual reports—rating shaking intensity on a structured questionnaire covering felt motion, sounds, object movement, and structural effects—into aggregate community intensity values that correlate strongly with instrumental measurements. This crowdsourced intensity data is now incorporated into ShakeMap products alongside seismograph recordings.

Felt radius data over decades reveals systematic regional patterns. In the stable cratonic interior of the eastern US, M5.0 earthquakes have been felt at distances exceeding 1,000 km—the 2011 Virginia M5.8 was felt from Georgia to Nova Scotia. In California's tectonically active crust, a M5.0 is typically felt within 200 km. The New Madrid Seismic Zone, straddling Missouri, Arkansas, and Tennessee, presents a particular challenge: the region has produced M7.0–M8.0 events (estimated, 1811–1812) and sits atop thick, seismically efficient sedimentary sequences; a repeat sequence today would impact a population orders of magnitude larger than the sparse frontier settlements of the early 19th century.

FAQ

什么是修正麦加利烈度标度？

The Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) scale, developed by Giuseppe Mercalli in 1902 and revised by Harry Wood and Frank Neumann in 1931, describes the intensity of ground shaking at a specific location on a Roman numeral scale from I to XII. MMI I is 'not felt except by a very few under especially favorable conditions.' MMI IV is 'felt indoors by many'; dishes rattle. MMI VI is 'felt by all'; heavy furniture moves, some plaster falls. MMI VIII causes 'considerable damage in ordinary buildings'; partial collapse of poorly built structures. MMI X describes 'most masonry and frame structures destroyed.' MMI XII represents 'total destruction'; objects thrown into the air. Reports from residents after earthquakes are systematically collected by USGS 'Did You Feel It?' and used to map intensity distributions.

Why do some earthquakes feel different even at the same distance?

Several factors cause shaking to feel different at identical distances from the same earthquake. Soil amplification is the dominant local effect: soft sediments amplify ground motion and extend its duration compared to hard rock. Local geology can amplify shaking by factors of 2–10 in peak ground velocity. Building resonance also plays a role: tall buildings sway more during long-period waves that travel farther from the source, so a high-rise in a distant city may sway noticeably while a single-story home nearby is unaffected. The radiation pattern of the earthquake source—controlled by fault geometry—creates directional variations in amplitude. Finally, topographic effects (ridge amplification, valley trapping) can locally increase or decrease shaking by factors of 1.5–2.

How many people typically feel a large earthquake?

USGS PAGER (Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response) estimates population exposure to shaking levels in near-real-time after earthquakes. A M6.5 occurring in a populated region may be felt by 10–50 million people at intensities ranging from barely felt (MMI II–III) to damaging (MMI VII+). The 2011 Tohoku M9.1 earthquake was felt across the entire Japanese archipelago (population ~127 million) and recorded instrumentally in North America, Europe, and Australia. USGS 'Did You Feel It?' (DYFI) reports provide crowd-sourced intensity data; major California earthquakes regularly generate hundreds of thousands of DYFI reports within 30 minutes, demonstrating the extraordinary geographic reach of felt shaking.

Can animals detect earthquakes before humans feel them?

Anecdotal reports of unusual animal behavior before earthquakes have a multi-century history and have been studied scientifically with mixed results. Some well-documented mechanisms could theoretically allow animal pre-earthquake detection: radon gas emanating from stressed rock before rupture, electromagnetic signals from piezoelectric effects in quartz-bearing rock, and changes in well water levels. The 2011 Peru study (Nature, Bleier et al.) documented behavioral changes in dogs correlating with seismic events in the preceding days. However, controlled prospective studies—designed to distinguish genuine precursory behavior from random behavioral variation—have not produced reliable results. The scientific consensus is that while physical precursors sometimes precede earthquakes, no animal behavior pattern has demonstrated predictive skill sufficient for operational early warning.

What is seismic early warning and how does it differ from prediction?

Earthquake early warning (EEW) and earthquake prediction are fundamentally different concepts. EEW detects the initial, less-damaging P-waves from a seismic event seconds after rupture begins and transmits automated alerts before the slower, more-destructive S-waves and surface waves arrive at distant locations. ShakeAlert, deployed by USGS across the western US, provides 2–90 seconds of warning depending on distance from the epicenter—enough time to stop trains, open fire station doors, or adopt protective posture. Japan's J-ALERT system provides up to 60–90 seconds warning for distant events. Earthquake prediction, by contrast, attempts to specify the time, location, and magnitude of a future earthquake before it occurs—a goal that remains scientifically unachieved for deterministic forecasts on timescales of days to years.