Historische Erdbebensuche

Search and filter the historical earthquake database by country, magnitude, year, and impact.

Analysis

Den historischen Erdbebenkatalog erkunden

Die historischen Erdbebenaufzeichnungen reichen über 4.000 Jahre zurück, wobei die frühesten dokumentierten Ereignisse auf etwa 2150 v. Chr. in China datieren. Diese Datenbank schöpft aus der NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Significant Earthquake Database, die über 5.700 Erdbeben katalogisiert, die Todesopfer oder erhebliche Schäden verursachten oder Magnituden von 7,5 oder mehr hatten. Die instrumentelle Ära der Seismologie begann erst im späten 19. Jahrhundert, sodass frühere Aufzeichnungen auf schriftlichen Berichten, geologischen Belegen und archäologischen Funden beruhen.

Die Untersuchung historischer Erdbeben offenbart wichtige Muster. Die globale Erdbebenaufzeichnung zeigt, dass dieselben Verwerfungssysteme wiederholt große Erdbeben erzeugen, oft mit Wiederkehrintervallen von Jahrzehnten bis Jahrhunderten. Die Cascadia-Subduktionszone zum Beispiel brach zuletzt bei einem M9,0-Ereignis im Jahr 1700 und erzeugt solche Ereignisse etwa alle 200–500 Jahre. Historische Analysen zeigen auch, dass Erdbebenopferzahlen mehr durch Gebäudeverwundbarkeit und Bevölkerungsdichte als durch die Magnitude allein bestimmt werden – das Haiti-Erdbeben 2010 (M7,0) tötete über 200.000 Menschen, während das stärkere Chile-Erdbeben 2010 (M8,8) 525 tötete, größtenteils dank Chiles überlegener Bauvorschriften.

Wichtige Erkenntnisse aus historischen Daten

Das tödlichste registrierte Erdbeben ist das Shaanxi-Erdbeben von 1556 in China (geschätzt M8,0–8,3), das etwa 830.000 Menschen tötete – die meisten lebten in Yaodong-Höhlenwohnungen, die in Lössklippen gegraben waren und einstürzten.
Tsunamis, die durch submarine Erdbeben erzeugt wurden, haben historisch die Mehrheit der Todesopfer bei großen Erdbeben an Ozeangrenzen verursacht, wie beim Ereignis im Indischen Ozean 2004 (M9,1, ca. 230.000 Tote).
Erdbebenkataloge werden im Laufe der Zeit zunehmend vollständig: Aufzeichnungen vor 1900 werden von sehr großen oder sehr tödlichen Ereignissen dominiert, während die instrumentelle Ära zunehmend kleinere Erdbeben erfasst.
Seismische Lücken – Verwerfungsabschnitte, die ungewöhnlich lange nicht gebrochen sind – sind Gebiete erhöhter Besorgnis, da angesammelte Spannung schließlich freigesetzt werden muss.

Häufige Anwendungen

Erforschung der seismischen Geschichte eines bestimmten Landes oder einer Region für akademische, journalistische oder politische Zwecke.
Erkennen von Mustern in der Erdbeben-Wiederkehr, um langfristiges seismisches Risiko zu verstehen.
Auffinden historischer tsunamierzeugender Erdbeben für die Küstengefahrenbewertung.
Vergleich von Opferzahlen verschiedener Ereignisse, um zu untersuchen, wie Bauvorschriften und Vorbereitung die Ergebnisse beeinflussen.

How to Use

1
Set Your Search Filters
Filter the USGS and ISC historical catalog by region (country, bounding box, or fault system), magnitude range (Mw ≥ 4.0 for complete global coverage post-1976), date range, and depth. The USGS catalog extends to 1900 for events Mw ≥ 6.0.
2
Sort and Explore Results
Sort results by magnitude, date, depth, or fatalities. Click any event to access the full USGS event page with focal mechanism, ShakeMap, PAGER loss estimates, and Did You Feel It reports if available.
3
Export for Analysis
Export filtered results as CSV or GeoJSON for use in mapping tools or statistical analysis. Note that catalog completeness varies by region and time period—pre-1960 catalogs are substantially incomplete below M6.5 in many regions.

About

Historical earthquake catalogs are the foundational datasets of earthquake science, encoding the accumulated seismic history of a region across centuries of observations. The USGS Earthquake Hazards Program catalog, the ISC Bulletin, and regional catalogs such as the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) catalog are continuously updated as new events occur and historical events are re-analyzed with modern methods. Catalog completeness—the minimum magnitude above which all earthquakes in a region are reliably recorded—is the key limitation for time-series analysis; completeness typically increases (improves) over time with denser networks and is spatially variable, being highest in Japan, California, and parts of Europe.

The shift from analog to digital seismograph networks beginning in the 1970s–80s dramatically improved both completeness and parameter accuracy. Modern moment tensor catalogs (Harvard CMT, GCMT, USGS W-phase CMT) provide standardized source mechanism solutions for all M ≥ 5.5 events since 1976, enabling global analyses of focal mechanism populations, stress field orientations, and tectonic regime classification. The IRIS SYNGINE and IRIS DMC provide open access to seismic waveform archives, enabling retrospective analysis of historical events with contemporary methods.

Open data policies have transformed earthquake science's ability to mine historical records. The USGS ComCat (Comprehensive Earthquake Catalog) provides API access to over 3 million events with searchable parameters; the ISC catalog contains 10+ million events since 1900. Machine learning approaches applied to these large catalogs are identifying previously undetected seismicity patterns, precisely relocating historical events using modern velocity models, and extracting fault geometry from waveform similarity clustering. The emerging field of earthquake forensics combines these catalog analyses with paleoseismic field observations, InSAR surface deformation records, and geodetic strain rate models to produce increasingly comprehensive seismic source models for hazard assessment.

FAQ

How far back does the historical earthquake record go?

The instrumental seismic record begins in 1900, following the development of the Wiechert and Milne seismographs. However, historical documentary records of earthquakes in densely populated regions extend much further: Chinese records document earthquakes to approximately 700 BCE; Middle Eastern records to around 2000 BCE; and European records to classical antiquity. Japan's catalog contains documented events back to the 7th century CE. These historical records allow paleoseismologists to estimate recurrence intervals for major fault systems, though magnitude estimates from pre-instrumental records carry large uncertainties (±0.5 magnitude units). The International Seismological Centre (ISC) bulletin, the most comprehensive global catalog, provides systematic coverage from 1900 with completeness above M7.0 and from approximately 1960 with completeness above M5.0 globally.

Which country has the most earthquakes?

Japan experiences the world's highest earthquake frequency among populated nations, recording roughly 1,500 earthquakes per year detectable by standard seismographs (and far more by Japan's ultra-dense Hi-net network). Indonesia, China, Iran, Turkey, and the United States (particularly Alaska and California) also rank among the most seismically active countries. By total seismic energy release, the Pacific subduction zones dominate: Chile, Alaska, Japan, and Indonesia collectively account for the majority of global seismic moment release. By impact on population, Turkey, Iran, China, and Italy have historically experienced the most damaging earthquakes relative to their land area and population exposure, due to a combination of high hazard, dense population in hazardous areas, and historically vulnerable building stock.

What was the most damaging earthquake in history?

The 1556 Shaanxi earthquake in China is estimated to have killed approximately 830,000 people—the highest death toll in the historical earthquake record. The catastrophic losses resulted from the earthquake striking a densely populated region where much of the population lived in yaodong, cave dwellings carved into soft loess cliffs that collapsed during the event. The 1976 Tangshan earthquake (China) caused an officially reported 242,419 deaths (other estimates suggest up to 650,000). In the instrumental era, the 2010 Haiti earthquake (M7.0) caused approximately 160,000–316,000 deaths, driven by densely built poor-quality construction on soft sediments near the epicenter. Economic losses are dominated by developed-world events: the 1995 Kobe and 2011 Tohoku earthquakes each caused losses exceeding US$100–200 billion.

How do scientists compile historical earthquake catalogs?

Historical earthquake catalog compilation is a multi-source integration process. Instrumental records from seismograph networks are processed by national and international agencies (USGS, GFZ, ISC, EMSC) and assembled into standardized bulletins with hypocentral parameters and magnitudes. For the pre-instrumental period (pre-1900), catalog compilers systematically search documentary sources: monastery chronicles, government administrative records, newspaper archives, scientific expedition reports, and indigenous oral traditions. Magnitude and location are estimated from isoseismal maps drawn from intensity reports, using regression relations that convert felt-area distributions to Mw equivalents. Paleoseismic data—evidence of fault rupture preserved in trenched sediment exposures—extends the record into prehistory but provides only magnitude bounds and recurrence intervals, not precise dates.

What can historical earthquake data tell us about future seismicity?

Historical earthquake data underlies all probabilistic seismic hazard assessment through several pathways. The observed frequency-magnitude distribution on a fault system constrains the Gutenberg-Richter a and b parameters, quantifying the relative frequency of small versus large events. Recurrence intervals for characteristic earthquakes on specific faults—derived from combining instrumental, historical, and paleoseismic observations—determine the long-term rate of large event production. Fault interaction studies use historical sequences to quantify Coulomb stress transfer between faults: a large earthquake alters stress on neighboring faults, sometimes bringing them closer to failure ('stress loading') and sometimes moving them away ('stress shadowing'). However, these inputs produce probabilistic forecasts with return periods measured in decades to centuries—they do not enable short-term deterministic prediction of specific future events.